Eldridge, Sherrie. Twenty
Things Adopted Kids Wish Their Adoptive Parents Knew. New York: Dell
Publishing, 1999.
Sherrie Eldridge, the author of Twenty
Things Adopted Kids Wish Their Adoptive Parents Knew, is an adoptee
herself. Throughout the book, she uses several personal anecdotes to explain
the point of view of the adoptee. She has also formed the organization called Jewel Among Jewels Adoption Network, Inc.
which helps to educate others about the adoptee’s perspective.
This book is like a memoir in that
it is a collection of stories and perspectives from the author. Eldridge occasionally
brings in quotes from other books that support the ideas she is trying to
convey. It is written for the audience of adoptive parents.
Rating: 3) I found this book
somewhat interesting. I would only recommend it for adoptive parents who seem
to be having trouble connecting with their adopted child.
Twenty Things Adopted Kids Wish
Their Adoptive Parents Knew is not available at the CSB/SJU libraries and I
would not recommend buying this book. I found it at my public library at home.
Review
The
book Twenty Things Adopted Kids Wish Their Adoptive Parents Knew by
Sherrie Eldridge lays out various ideas of what adoptees may be thinking and
what the adoptive parents can do to work towards a healthier relationship with
their child. With the author being an adoptee herself, the book is fairly
one-sided toward the adoptees. Eldridge does pull out some good points, but she
tends to repeat herself and focus on the negatives.
The
main points that Eldridge suggests within her “twenty things” are adoption
loss, false guilt, no closure, toxic shame, and fear of abandonment and
rejection. Throughout her book, these are the ideas that come up again and
again. Her first statement is that all adoptees experience an excruciatingly
painful loss at the beginning of their life, which she refers to as “adoption
loss.” She says, “Loss for the adoptee is unlike other losses we have come to
expect in a lifetime, such as death and divorce. Adoption is more pervasive,
less socially recognized, and more profound” (Eldridge, pg 5). It is because of
this that Eldridge says that adoptive parents need to provide a very open and
understanding relationship with their child to allow for discussion about this
loss and how to cope with it. This is very important not only for the adoptee,
but also for everyone else involved. Eldridge explains, “When adoption loss is
not validated, verbalized, and grieved, every member of the family suffers”
(Eldridge, pg 8). Throughout this book, she provides many different examples of
how to open up this relationship and let the adoptee know that it is okay to
talk about anything that is on their mind. Once this idea of adoption loss is
introduced, Eldridge branches off and begins to talk about reasons why this
loss can be so painful and different ways that children can act in response to
this loss.
Overall, the book
did provide a few good points, though I personally wouldn’t recommend it. The main
thing that I didn’t like was its negative tone and how Eldridge seemed to say
that these are thoughts and feelings that all
adoptees have and that we should assume this unless they tell us otherwise.
There was only one time where she contradicted herself. She said, “But don’t
look for problems where there are none. Not all adoptees have a difficult time
on their birthday. Many aren’t fazed at all” (Eldridge, pg 176). Other than
this, she tells the reader that these thoughts that she lays out are at least
in the back of every adoptee’s head. The main problem with this mentality is it
seems like she did not have a very positive experience with adoption. That
could be a result of many different things, but she never really mentions that
every adoption story is different. Each child is different, every situation is
different, every set of adoptive parents is different. Eldridge clumps all of
these different stories into one basic adoptee perspective. I think that this
is inaccurate, though I do think that some of her ideas are good for adoptive
parents to be mindful of.
Another
aspect of this book that I disliked was the amount of repetition Eldridge uses
from chapter to chapter. I understand that there are certain things she wanted
to be heard, but after about five or six chapters in, I felt like I was reading
the same things over and over again. I also disagreed with her comment at the
end of the book. She said, “You have learned how to access the world of your
child, become sensitive to his unspoken needs and then validate his emotional
reality. Congratulations! That makes you real parents and secures your place in
your child’s life” (Eldridge, pg 211). It is the end of that quote that frustrates
me the most. Just reading a book won’t make you a “real parent,” at least not
with my idea of what a “real parent” is. I also don’t think that it is possible
to “secure your place in your child’s life,” with adoptive--or birth parents
for that matter. Every family and every set of relationships is different. You
can be the perfect parent and do everything right in raising your child and
still end up on the outside of their life. It truly varies from person to person.
Though
I ended up not liking the book for the most part, I do believe that some of the
points could be helpful for adoptive parents. I did like that this book is a
collection of ideas from an adoptee’s perspective. The most important point
that Eldridge makes is that it is essential to work to form a very open
relationship with your child and always encourage dialogue within the family.
In the beginning of the book, she lists what I like to call the yay’s and nay’s
of adoption. These are just some basic ideas of what you should and shouldn’t
do if you would like to “gain access” into your child’s thoughts and feelings.
Eldridge also suggests throughout the book different ideas of things to say to
your child within different situations. This certainly could be very helpful
for adoptive parents who just don’t know how to have a dialogue with their
child.
Therefore, I would
only recommend this book to adoptive parents as long as they also read some
books with other perspectives. Sherrie Eldridge seems to be very one-sided,
though she did attempt to provide examples from other books written by
adoptees, parents, and psychologists. I found that I liked the words of the
other authors better than her own a majority of the time. For example, she
quotes the book The Spirit of Open Adoption by James Gritter, “We must
be careful not to sanitize, sentimentalize, or even glamorize the pain of
adoption; it really is miserable stuff, and it is intensely personal. It is
interior. The pain of adoption is not something that happens to a person; it is
the person. Because the pain is so primal, it is virtually impossible to
describe” (Eldridge, pg 7). It was much easier for me to understand the words
of Gritter on adoption loss than those of Eldridge. I believe that with some of
the key points from Eldridge in the back of their mind along with other
perspectives on the topic, adoptive parents can be successful in connecting
with their adopted child.
Book Review Reply 2
ReplyDeleteI also read the book Twenty Things Adopted Kids Wish Their Adoptive Parents Knew by Sherrie Eldridge and had similar thoughts. I had trouble with the fact that she generalized her own thoughts and feelings related to her adoption experience to ALL adoptees. Although I am not an adoptee myself, I found that difficult to believe that every adoptee deals with such a painful loss that has such deep effects on their relationships with others. I also completely agree with you that her thoughts were continually negative and the repetition she used was tiresome. I felt the exact same thing after reading the first 6 chapters. She really drilled it into the readers heads that adoptees experience a deep and emotional loss. I read the book because I have considered adoption some day but after reading this book, I don't know if I would consider it anymore because of her negativity.
However, this critical view she uses can be a good thing. I appreciate her honesty and ability to not "sugar coat" her adoption experience. She seemed very real in her interpretation of the emotions adoptees go through and who am I to say that she is not 100% correct in her interpretation? Although I agree her argument was very one sided and she didn't leave room for much discussion other opinions, it was a good perspective to hear from. In class I feel like we have discussed how the adoption process affects the birthmothers and the adoptive parents but we have not read a ton on the viewpoints of adoptees, especially negative viewpoints. It was a good wake up call for me to read this and understand that it is not always rainbows and butterflies for adoptees who are adopted into a nice and loving home.
Eldridge does give some helpful suggestions to parents for how to deal with these issues IF they come up. Therefore, I recommended this book to people planning to adopt as well and also included the recommendation that they read other adoption literature because of the one-sidedness to Eldridge's book.
Book Review Reply 2
ReplyDeleteLike Natalie said, it seems strange that the author generalized her own experience to adoptees. It doesn't seem logical to say that ALL adoptees experience a feeling of loss at the beginning of their lives. In the past, I'm sure many have gone through life without even knowing that they were adopted. Others seem to be okay with the fact that they were and hardly ever consider seeking out their birthparents, like one of the speakers we had in class. So that statement doesn't seem to have any grounds.
All of the reviews I've read so far, or heard in class, seemed to give positive remarks about their books. Its interesting to see one that doesn't and I can completely understand why. When I read the title of the book (before going through the review), I immediately thought that it would be from the view points of numerous adoptees stating what they thought their adoptive families should have done in certain situations. After reading what you said about the opening remarks, it was clear that the book was a bit biased. It seems that the title would be a bit misleading to adoptive parents seeking more broad advice, rather than a view based on the author's personal experiences. Therefore adoptive parents, especially prospective should be wary of the materials they use to educate themselves.
I think it would be interesting to hear the author's personal experience. Perhaps it would explain her biased way of writing.
Book Review Comment 2:
ReplyDeleteKatie-
I think you did a great job analyzing Eldridge's book. I really liked how I was able to gather so much information about her perspective in this book when I read Twenty Life-Transforming Choices Adoptees Need to Make also by Sherrie Eldridge. Comparing the book I read to yours and Natalie's thoughts about her being repetitive and only sticking to her stories was very enlightening. I say this because she must have received comments on those exact points; Eldridge interviewed a massive variety of adoptees in order for her to pull together the book I read along with some of her information and perspectives.
Your review makes me think about reading this piece (as an adoptee) and comparing the points brought up with the work I read for review. I also found that she is very negative in her other book; but instead of being negative solely on adoption I think she takes a new approach by addressing the negative aspects in adoption and not dissing on adoption.
I thought your review was accurate and very enjoyable to read. What I like about most is your rating of the book. I understand your disliking of the work and that Eldridge was a little less experienced prior to the book I read, but the fact that you recommended this piece for only adoptive parents was great because it can be paralleled to my strong recommendation for adoptees to read her Life-Transforming Choices piece.
Overall, great job. Keep up the good work.
Michael